Hampton v City
+10
SASCHA
yuffie
comrade powell
Notters
stillmanjunior
Midsomer-chris
BenE
cbtroman
LB
Luton Roman
14 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Hampton v City
Lost 1-3. Place we never do well but looks like we had chances when ahead to consolidate.
Luton Roman- Posts : 2299
Join date : 2014-02-24
Re: Hampton v City
I don't understand our reluctance to use substitutes. It sounds like Murphy only went off because he was in danger of getting sent off and with three strikers on the bench I would have thought we might have put at least one of them on when we went behind. We didn't have anything to lose at that stage by going for it and we conceded another goal anyway.
Hopefully JG's plan will come to fruition soon, and perhaps Whitehawk next week might give us the boost we need, alternatively...
Hopefully JG's plan will come to fruition soon, and perhaps Whitehawk next week might give us the boost we need, alternatively...
LB- Posts : 1293
Join date : 2014-02-23
Re: Hampton v City
Don't get why he's playing Artus up front - he's a midfielder not a striker and it's not the time of the season to experiment especially when as mentioned there are other strikers available. Why get Mohamed back if not going to play him?
cbtroman- Posts : 59
Join date : 2016-04-02
Re: Hampton v City
The general consensus was that we didn't look like scoring second half and it was a mystery why we didn't get another striker on. Watkins did hit the post but it was a speculative shot.
We look tentative in front of goal. We created some decent openings but no one is putting their laces through it. Lucas seems to be the only one prepared to have a go but he isn't getting any game time. I know Kaid is getting a bit frustrated at not being given a chance too. Given our inability in front of goal you can understand why.
I thought we looked great first half but couldn't put the game to bed. The Hampton management nullified our threat and despite them being quite mediochre got the win they hardly deserved.
We look tentative in front of goal. We created some decent openings but no one is putting their laces through it. Lucas seems to be the only one prepared to have a go but he isn't getting any game time. I know Kaid is getting a bit frustrated at not being given a chance too. Given our inability in front of goal you can understand why.
I thought we looked great first half but couldn't put the game to bed. The Hampton management nullified our threat and despite them being quite mediochre got the win they hardly deserved.
BenE- Posts : 2552
Join date : 2014-02-11
Re: Hampton v City
There is a very wise quotation (attributed to Albert Einstein) which says :
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.
Now, I am not saying that we have got an insane manager but why, oh why, oh why when things are going as badly as they were in the second half today did he not make any significant changes ??? I would rather we lost 6-1 and go down making a supreme effort to improve matters, than see another bout of football like today's second half.
Why did Morgan seem to be at the front on his own . . . . . surely Andy Watkins needs to be up front and centre as well ?
As someone said above . . . . . Why not put Kaid Mohamed on ? What is the point in having him sitting on the bench game after game ? Jarvis and Lucas have played well in past matches and there was someone on the bench today who I have not seen before . . . . . Adam Forster. Ok . . . I know that a new player is an unknown quantity but for goodness sake give him a go to see if we can stop that 2-1, 3-1 downward spiral.
Having slumped to 14th in the league surely it is time for drastic changes not to just keep "doing the same thing over and over again".
People who know me know that I am normally a very positive person and not a moaner. Can I just say that the first 30 minutes of the home match against Chelmsford was some of the best football I have seen in a very long time. Whatever was being done right that day needs to be built upon in the future.
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”.
Now, I am not saying that we have got an insane manager but why, oh why, oh why when things are going as badly as they were in the second half today did he not make any significant changes ??? I would rather we lost 6-1 and go down making a supreme effort to improve matters, than see another bout of football like today's second half.
Why did Morgan seem to be at the front on his own . . . . . surely Andy Watkins needs to be up front and centre as well ?
As someone said above . . . . . Why not put Kaid Mohamed on ? What is the point in having him sitting on the bench game after game ? Jarvis and Lucas have played well in past matches and there was someone on the bench today who I have not seen before . . . . . Adam Forster. Ok . . . I know that a new player is an unknown quantity but for goodness sake give him a go to see if we can stop that 2-1, 3-1 downward spiral.
Having slumped to 14th in the league surely it is time for drastic changes not to just keep "doing the same thing over and over again".
People who know me know that I am normally a very positive person and not a moaner. Can I just say that the first 30 minutes of the home match against Chelmsford was some of the best football I have seen in a very long time. Whatever was being done right that day needs to be built upon in the future.
Midsomer-chris- Posts : 1388
Join date : 2014-02-21
Age : 66
Re: Hampton v City
Just to point a few things out...
Frankie Artus hasn’t played up front since Jerry came in, he’s been attacking midfield.
I get the impression Kaid is almost making up the numbers at the moment as Jerry said he’s not fit. Bar 90 in the SPC and a few brief sub appearances for us and Wealdstone he hasn’t played. No idea who he spent pre-season with.
Adam Forster is a goalkeeper.
I’ll admit to being mystified over Lucas’ sudden exclusion though. He at least gets into those positions to score and four goals during his time on the pitch isn’t a bad ratio.
Frankie Artus hasn’t played up front since Jerry came in, he’s been attacking midfield.
I get the impression Kaid is almost making up the numbers at the moment as Jerry said he’s not fit. Bar 90 in the SPC and a few brief sub appearances for us and Wealdstone he hasn’t played. No idea who he spent pre-season with.
Adam Forster is a goalkeeper.
I’ll admit to being mystified over Lucas’ sudden exclusion though. He at least gets into those positions to score and four goals during his time on the pitch isn’t a bad ratio.
stillmanjunior- Posts : 2185
Join date : 2014-02-21
Age : 39
Location : Press box
Re: Hampton v City
He must have a substantially better goals per minute ratio than anyone else.
BenE- Posts : 2552
Join date : 2014-02-11
Re: Hampton v City
The lack of substitutions is getting my goat at the moment, and I'm usually one of our more calmer and optimistic fans. When you're consistently not creating chances, then our style of play has to change. Nothing to lose.
I didn't think Hampton & Richmond were a good side yesterday, but thoroughly felt they deserved their victory. They made the most of their opportunities and scored from them. All too often have I seen city go on the attack and then hold the ball, allowing defenders time to run back and stop any further advance.
As much as I want to see entertaining games, I wouldn't mind it if every now and again we do what H&R's did yesterday.
I didn't think Hampton & Richmond were a good side yesterday, but thoroughly felt they deserved their victory. They made the most of their opportunities and scored from them. All too often have I seen city go on the attack and then hold the ball, allowing defenders time to run back and stop any further advance.
As much as I want to see entertaining games, I wouldn't mind it if every now and again we do what H&R's did yesterday.
Notters- Posts : 27
Join date : 2015-05-18
Re: Hampton v City
We were a little more direct yesterday and we did create chances we just couldn't finish them.
One thing that has to change is that someone needs to move towards the near post. Too often any ball into the middle is cut out by the defenders. Someone like Jarvis should have been getting in there but he consistently goes to the back post. He does have a good leap on him but you get more success getting in front of the defenders.
One thing that has to change is that someone needs to move towards the near post. Too often any ball into the middle is cut out by the defenders. Someone like Jarvis should have been getting in there but he consistently goes to the back post. He does have a good leap on him but you get more success getting in front of the defenders.
BenE- Posts : 2552
Join date : 2014-02-11
Re: Hampton v City
Midsomer-chris wrote: Can I just say that the first 30 minutes of the home match against Chelmsford was some of the best football I have seen in a very long time. Whatever was being done right that day needs to be built upon in the future.
I agree that our play in the early stages of the Chelmsford game was excellent and to be fair, I think we came close to matching it for the first third of yesterday's. I'm sure that a second goal would have killed off such an ordinary team as Hampton but their equaliser came at exactly the right time for them and the worst for us.
comrade powell- Posts : 7011
Join date : 2014-01-27
Re: Hampton v City
Notters wrote:As much as I want to see entertaining games, I wouldn't mind it if every now and again we do what H&R's did yesterday.
Except for their pathetic play acting and constant whinging to the ref! Compare with the way Dan Ball got up immediately after being clattered on Tuesday.
comrade powell- Posts : 7011
Join date : 2014-01-27
Re: Hampton v City
comrade powell wrote:Midsomer-chris wrote: Can I just say that the first 30 minutes of the home match against Chelmsford was some of the best football I have seen in a very long time. Whatever was being done right that day needs to be built upon in the future.
I agree that our play in the early stages of the Chelmsford game was excellent and to be fair, I think we came close to matching it for the first third of yesterday's. I'm sure that a second goal would have killed off such an ordinary team as Hampton but their equaliser came at exactly the right time for them and the worst for us.
Exactly.
Though the shouts at the end of, "we're not f*****g Brazil" and '"F*** off, Jerry", show that not everyone is taking the result quite so philosophically.
yuffie- Posts : 1024
Join date : 2014-02-20
Re: Hampton v City
In which case I'm glad I ran for my bus after the 3rd goal and missed that...
comrade powell- Posts : 7011
Join date : 2014-01-27
Re: Hampton v City
I believe the culprit to whom you are referring Simon, assuming that it is a lone voice, is a certain moron that stands with The Legion.
He often shouts obscenities at home games , usually directed at individuals and in my opinion should be singled out and taken to one side for a talking to.
If the steward that patrols the popular side was of any use and did his job correctly then this would have been sorted by now. The so called legion members could also have a word.
I stand behind this lot when at the Bath end and I am getting very close to having a word with him myself.
But of course I wont as I do not like confrontations.
His language really is not what we need and should be dealt with.
He often shouts obscenities at home games , usually directed at individuals and in my opinion should be singled out and taken to one side for a talking to.
If the steward that patrols the popular side was of any use and did his job correctly then this would have been sorted by now. The so called legion members could also have a word.
I stand behind this lot when at the Bath end and I am getting very close to having a word with him myself.
But of course I wont as I do not like confrontations.
His language really is not what we need and should be dealt with.
SASCHA- Posts : 152
Join date : 2014-02-28
Re: Hampton v City
If said steward could apply the same to a couple around the tea bar too that'd be dandy, ta.
Dave- Posts : 565
Join date : 2014-02-20
Location : Baff
Re: Hampton v City
I heard a few dissenting voices at full-time. It must have been loud to drown out the relentless abuse from the Hampton dugout, who questioned decisions more than their players, incredibly.
Must admit I haven't noticed it before, but then I'm usually too busy waffling on the radio or tannoy. Wish I packed ear plugs for the filming on Saturday.
Must admit I haven't noticed it before, but then I'm usually too busy waffling on the radio or tannoy. Wish I packed ear plugs for the filming on Saturday.
stillmanjunior- Posts : 2185
Join date : 2014-02-21
Age : 39
Location : Press box
Re: Hampton v City
Palms wrote:If said steward could apply the same to a couple around the tea bar too that'd be dandy, ta.
You should be concentrating on the recording!!!
Colin Voutt- Posts : 377
Join date : 2014-02-20
Age : 74
Location : Combe Down, Bath
Re: Hampton v City
I must admit it left a sour feeling with me as I didn't think it was in the least justified and was shouted as Jerry was coming over to thank the fans for their support. He stopped in his tracks and stared at the crowd for a few moments before turning away - no doubt bitterly disappointed.
BenE- Posts : 2552
Join date : 2014-02-11
Re: Hampton v City
BenE wrote:I must admit it left a sour feeling with me as I didn't think it was in the least justified and was shouted as Jerry was coming over to thank the fans for their support. He stopped in his tracks and stared at the crowd for a few moments before turning away - no doubt bitterly disappointed.
Yep, I felt the same and saw Jerry's reaction. I didn't see who actually shouted it (I was putting my camera away) although I think Gary is probably correct.
yuffie- Posts : 1024
Join date : 2014-02-20
Re: Hampton v City
Colin Voutt wrote:Palms wrote:If said steward could apply the same to a couple around the tea bar too that'd be dandy, ta.
You should be concentrating on the recording!!!
Sure is hard to some weeks!!!
Dave- Posts : 565
Join date : 2014-02-20
Location : Baff
Re: Hampton v City
I'm a little shocked that people are singling out one person for shouting out in frustration at the Hampton game, in any case they are a fan just as much as the rest of us and is enititled to an opinion, the comment made about taking him to one side to have a talking to is laughable, how many fans shout out in disgruntled anger and frustration, I could count at least 20 odd especially in home games, just because not everyone is jumping on the Gill Bandwagon doesn't make them any less of a fan, me personally would have results with gritty performances then pretty football that gets us nothing
BiddyBidgood- Posts : 1
Join date : 2017-11-08
Re: Hampton v City
I suppose it depends on whether you think it is acceptable to abuse someone because you are frustrated.
BenE- Posts : 2552
Join date : 2014-02-11
Re: Hampton v City
So BiddyBidgood believes that the comment made by me about taking the culprit of regular offensive, foul and abusive behaviour to one side for a quite word is laughable.
Let me point out that this person acts in a disturbing manner. His comments are usually sustained and almost as though he has very little self control of what comes out of his mouth.
Those stood with him should feel embarrassed and need to explain to him that he is simply making a pratt of himself.
If I were a steward then would certainly have dealt with it by now, not quite sure if they (stewards) are there just as a presence and of course because they are required under safety laws.
We are trying to encourage youngsters to this club as a fan base usually accompanied by adults. Often with one off offers for certain games as an enticement, therefore these groups are often first time visitors.
What a wonderful memory for mum, dad and kids.
Please think before you SHOUT your obscenities young man.
Let me point out that this person acts in a disturbing manner. His comments are usually sustained and almost as though he has very little self control of what comes out of his mouth.
Those stood with him should feel embarrassed and need to explain to him that he is simply making a pratt of himself.
If I were a steward then would certainly have dealt with it by now, not quite sure if they (stewards) are there just as a presence and of course because they are required under safety laws.
We are trying to encourage youngsters to this club as a fan base usually accompanied by adults. Often with one off offers for certain games as an enticement, therefore these groups are often first time visitors.
What a wonderful memory for mum, dad and kids.
Please think before you SHOUT your obscenities young man.
SASCHA- Posts : 152
Join date : 2014-02-28
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Hampton and R v. City
» Hampton & R 0 v. City 0
» City v Hampton
» City 2 (Artus 17, Compton pen 25) v Hampton & R 0
» Hampton & Richmond Borough (1)2 Bath City (1)1
» Hampton & R 0 v. City 0
» City v Hampton
» City 2 (Artus 17, Compton pen 25) v Hampton & R 0
» Hampton & Richmond Borough (1)2 Bath City (1)1
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum