CITY O Dulwich 0

Battling performance which didn't look likely after first 15m when down to 10 men. But 0-0 at ht as Dulwich ran out pf ideas and they were no better 2nd half. City found resilience, put a foot in  got there first, and really could have won it but the lads were shattered. A great performance. We can survive.

Definitely a point gained in a real backs to the wall job. I thought Joe Rayners and Dan Ball did a fantastic job following the reshuffle.

Chipp have done us a big favour with their win at Ricay, with us helping them by denying Dulwich. Chelmsford chucked away a two goal lead and Welling lost. So things are looking a little better tonight.

If we do stay up I think we’ll be playing Dulwich again next season. Totally clueless in their approach and a shadow of the team who outplayed us at their place.

[quote="cTotally clueless in their approach and a shadow of the team who outplayed us at their place. [/quote]

Agree 100%

They looked like a side that was overconfident they would win and especially after the sending off. But it doesn't matter who you are you still have to put the effort in.
But we should take nothing away from our lads who were terrific.

A Dulwich fan enjoyed most of his day out according to their forum...

dire performance on the pitch spoilt a lovely away day! Such a beautiful city, good pubs and food, and only just over an hour on the train. Bath fans we met in and out of the ground were top notch, really welcoming so can't fault it (apart from the obvious).

Dulwich Web site gives a fair review, their teams approach was far too slow with no tempo allowing City time to build that battling defensive capability.

https://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/teams/56196/match-centre/1-9377210/report

Agreed. That excellent report is almost as good as KK’s.

Both reports give a good account of the game. Going down to ten men seemed to give City the simple focus of not conceding rather than the more tricky conundrum of how to find a winning combination.
A great display and could/should have pinched it.